Debunking Queer Secrets
OVERVIEW
DEBUNKINGQS.TUMBLR.COM TRAFFIC
Date Range
Date Range
Date Range
LINKS TO DOMAIN
WHAT DOES DEBUNKINGQS.TUMBLR.COM LOOK LIKE?
DEBUNKINGQS.TUMBLR.COM SERVER
BROWSER ICON
SERVER OS AND ENCODING
We found that debunkingqs.tumblr.com is implementing the openresty server.HTML TITLE
Debunking Queer SecretsDESCRIPTION
Welcome to Debunking QueerSecrets. Run by several members of the LBGT community, our goal is, in essence to mimic QueerSecretsSucks, in that we hope to point out problematic secrets that are posted.PARSED CONTENT
The web page states the following, "Run by several members of the LBGT community, our goal is, in essence to mimic QueerSecretsSucks, in that we hope to point out problematic secrets that are posted." We saw that the web site said " We dont want to shame submitters; we want to point out and explain underlyinginternalized bigotry that comes along once in a while in secrets, whether its homophobia, transphobia, racism, ableism, sexism, etc, etc." It also said " July 4, 2012 221PM. Trusting her to do what exactly? No cookie for you." The header had lesbian as the highest ranking optimized keyword. This keyword is followed by pansexual, dating, and no cookie for you which isn't as urgent as lesbian. The other words debunkingqs.tumblr.com uses is queer.SEEK SIMILAR BUSINESSES
Tuesday, 5 June 2012. Friday, 1 June 2012.
The Scientific and Rationalist Case for Life after Death - Michael Roll. Why Pseudoskeptics are not Skeptics. Cure for Pseudoskeptics misery? Sheldrake Exposes Richard Dawkins as a Fundamentalist. Randi runs away from Challenge. Michael Shermer debunked on his own show by Astrologer. Dean Radin lectures on Psi and Quantum Physics. Afterlife evidence at UN Symposium.
I believe it is my purpose to inspire women to take charge of their own health, to better understand exactly what their bodies are communicating to them by way of signs and symptoms and to understand that wellness relies within themselves.
Posted by Debunking Surrendra Gangadean. Recently posted a little gem over at BlackBurton. How is it a fallacy? Why should this fallacy be avoided in philosophical discussions? 8220;Debunking may be an acceptable met.